NANP Board Practice Exam

Which of the following statements about research argumentation is false?

1. Conceding that you don't have all the answers to your research question is never a good approach as it will cause readers to question all your arguments.

2. It is important to consider opposing viewpoints to strengthen your own argument.

3. Presenting clear and logical evidence is crucial to supporting your argument.

4. Your reader may have a lot at stake in a different solution, so present your argument considering their perspective.

The correct answer is: Conceding that you don't have all the answers to your research question is never a good approach as it will cause readers to question all your arguments.

The statement that conceding you don't have all the answers to your research question is never a good approach is false because acknowledging the limitations of your knowledge can actually enhance your credibility as a researcher. It shows intellectual humility and transparency, which can earn the respect of your readers. Recognizing that a topic is complex and that there are unresolved questions allows for a more nuanced discussion and indicates that you are open to further exploration and dialogue. This can encourage readers to engage with your work more critically, rather than dismissing it outright. In contrast, considering opposing viewpoints is an essential part of constructing a robust argument, as it allows you to anticipate counterarguments and address them effectively. Presenting clear and logical evidence is fundamental to persuasive argumentation, as it helps to substantiate your claims and convince readers of their validity. Lastly, acknowledging the perspective of your audience is crucial in research argumentation because it can help tailor your message to resonate with their values and concerns, making your argument more convincing.